ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00188
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be changed to reflect that he was medically retired.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants appeal was considered and denied by the Board on
5 Sep 12. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board,
see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
During a recent audit it was discovered that the applicants
response to the Air Force advisory opinion was misfiled and was
not available for the Boards consideration when they considered
his case. To ensure fair and equitable consideration of his
case, the applicants rebuttal submission was processed to the
Board for reconsideration.
In the applicants response he states that he was feeling
stressed because of his pending deployment and that he would be
leaving his wife with two autistic sons. He states while
debriefing a flight crew he became enraged when he noticed a
handmade poster with a sarcastic slogan poking fun at autistic
children, allegedly made by members of his squadron. Being the
parent of autistic children he was not amused and personally
removed the poster from the wall. After the debriefing, he took
the poster to the Social Actions Officer, who said they would
take care of it. In the days following, he came upon an animated
and immature conversation between other members in his squadron
also making fun of the autistic. He became infuriated and very
irresponsibly invited the two outside to the parking lot to
discuss this issue further. Luckily, they declined, but this
caused him to seek professional help. An Air Force doctor
diagnosed him with rage/depressive disorder, and prescribed him
medication. The medication made him feel better and the doctor
continued to prescribe it. However, he was told that if he did
not discontinue the usage he would be considered ineligible for
world-wide duty since he could not deploy into an austere
environment for a protracted period of time without his
medication. He contends there was no prior occurrence of his
medical condition which he feels was precipitated by the
aforementioned situation.
In support of his appeal the applicant provides a personal letter
and medical diagnosis report from his physician.
The applicants complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit
F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After careful consideration of this application, and the
applicants additional documentation provided, we remain
unpersuaded that his records should be changed to reflect that he
was medically retired. Therefore, in view of the above, and in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis upon
which to recommend favorable consideration of the applicants
request.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2012-00188 in Executive Session on 9 May 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 13 Sep 12,
w/Exhibits A through D.
Exhibit F. Applicants Rebuttal, undated, w/atch.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 28 Sep 13, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnished an entry-level separation with...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04486
and his affidavit, the letter she received from General H., the accounts of this mission by W.S., who flew out of Takhli that day, the affidavit of her father's best friend, the letters from MGen M., and her recollections as a child (her birth certificate verifies kinship, Exhibit N), it is apparent that her father died while trying to save the life of his wingman, Capt B. The applicant provided as evidence a personal affidavit. (Exhibit I) and her father's commander, Col. E.M. (Exhibits L...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01457
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01457 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted a waiver for being twice deferred for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5) while on Active duty so he may transfer to the Air Force Reserve (AFR). Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice with regards to the applicants request for a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03528
Addressing the applicants fitness to serve, the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, is a key tool utilized by Air Force providers to indicate whether a service member is under care for a medical condition affecting duty, mobility or requires a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disputes the facts in the BCMR Medical Consultants advisory. He knows three...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05899
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Post 9/11 GI Bill was effective in 2009; however, he just recently became aware of the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03275
SGPS supports the applicant’s request to have his records corrected to show elimination based on a medical diagnoses rather than SIE. However, if the Board’s decision is to grant the applicant’s request, his record may be changed to show elimination from JSUNT as a medical disqualification. We note that HQ AETC/SGPS (Exhibit B) supports the applicant’s request for correction of his record and the opportunity for him to apply for Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) consideration.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03284
In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, copies of the referral EPR memorandum, the referral EPR, his rebuttal statement, the initial referral EPR, an award nomination, a letter to his congressman, his student training report, a memorandum from his group superintendent, a statement of suspect/witness complaint, an evaluation appeals form, and a letter from his commander. The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit B. ...
The applicant further stated that the devil has been present and talked to him on numerous occasions inticing him to action. On 20 Jun 77, a report of evaluation by a psychiatrist indicated the applicant’s medical chart had been missing for the last two to three weeks according to the personnel record room though the psychiatrist was aware of having written at least two previous reports to applicant’s commander after various incidents in the squadron. The evaluation officer had two...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02885
He states he had never been on medication for migraines prior to his activation. The advisory statement that “…he reported no history of headaches prior to September 11, 2001, however, medical documentation indicates he experienced headaches associated with a neck condition in 2000 that prevented him from completing a period of active duty. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871
The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...